California 4000-Meter Peaks

VRMC Home
California Thirteeners List

Vulgarian Ramblers
California 4000-Meter Peaks

The following is a list of the California peaks above 4000 meters that also rise at least 300 feet above all saddles connecting them to higher peaks (i.e., the 4000-meter peaks with at least 300 feet of prominence). The 4000-Meter Peaks (4000’ers, 4000ers, 4K’ers 4Kers) is a subset of the 147 California Thirteeners. Please see the VRMC California Thirteeners page for more information on the methodology used to compile this and other VRMC peak lists.

Rank

Each passing peak is ranked among all other passing peaks, as determined using 'Best available data' (VRMC passing criteria).

Peak Name

Peak names not yet recognized by the U.S. Geological Survey are surrounded by quotation marks.

Click a peak name to see detailed peak information including a (2-D) MyTopo Map of the summit area.

Elevation

The elevation is determined using 'Best available data' (VRMC passing criteria).

Click an elevation to focus on detailed peak information.

Prominence

The prominence is determined using 'Best available data' (VRMC passing criteria).

1

4417m or 14,491'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

2

4382m or 14,375'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

3

White Mountain Peak

4342m or 14,246'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

4

4341m or 14,242'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

5

4317m or 14,162'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

6

4314m or 14,153'

387'

7

4294m or 14,088'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

8

4285m or 14,058'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

9

4275m or 14,026'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

10

4273m or 14,018'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

11

Middle Palisade

4271m or 14,012'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

12

4264m or 13,990'

968'

13

4263m or 13,986'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

14

4260m or 13,975'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

15

Mt. Stanford (South)

4259m or 13,973'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

16

“Barrett Peak” 1This peak appears to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it doesn't have sufficient prominence.

4256m or 13,962'

302'277' to 327' by altimeter error

17

4251m or 13,947'

738'

18

4246m or 13,930'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

19

“Mt. Morgenson” 1This peak appears to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it doesn't have sufficient prominence.

4245m or 13,927'

302'279' to 344' by contours

20

4235m or 13,893'

853'

21

4233m or 13,888'

774'

22

Norman Clyde Peak 1This peak appears to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it doesn't have sufficient prominence.

4223m or 13,855'

344'272' to 338' by contours

23

4220m or 13,845'

463'

24

4216m or 13,832'

551'

25

4216m or 13,831'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

26

4207m or 13,802'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

27

4206m or 13,799'

538'

28

4199m or 13,775'

669'

29

Mt. Morgan (South)

4190m or 13,748'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

30

4188m or 13,741'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

31

Bear Creek Spire

4188m or 13,740'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

32

4187m or 13,737'

702'

33

“East Barnard”

4183m or 13,724'

486'

34

4179m or 13,710'

554'

35

4177m or 13,704'

896'

36

4170m or 13,680'

557'

37

Midway Mountain

4165m or 13,664'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

38

“Second Kaweah”

4164m or 13,661'

545'

39

4161m or 13,652'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

40

Milestone Mountain

4157m or 13,638'

758'

41

4155m or 13,632'

541'

42

4150m or 13,615'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

43

4150m or 13,615'

385'

44

4146m or 13,602'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

45

University Peak

4142m or 13,589'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

46

“Ed Lane Peak”

4138m or 13,576'

892'

47

4136m or 13,570'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

48

4136m or 13,568'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

49

4134m or 13,563'

610'

50

4133m or 13,559'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

51

4131m or 13,553'

620'

52

“Milestone Mesa”

4129m or 13,547'

581'

53

4127m or 13,540'

446'

54

Thunder Mountain

4125m or 13,533'

564'

55

4122m or 13,525'

896'

56

“Squaretop” 1This peak appears to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it doesn't have sufficient prominence.

4122m or 13,524'

302'262' to 394' by contours

57

4118m or 13,510'

453'

58

4116m or 13,503'

813'

59

4113m or 13,494'

659'

60

4113m or 13,494'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

61

4113m or 13,494'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

62

Mt. Bolton Brown

4112m or 13,491'

574'

63

4107m or 13,474'

883'

64

Mt. Versteeg 1This peak appears to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it doesn't have sufficient prominence.

4106m or 13,470'

335'281' to 347' by contours

65

“Twelve Flags Peak”

4105m or 13,468'

340'

66

“Northwest Lamarck”

4104m or 13,464'

859'

67

4100m or 13,451'

509'

68

Montgomery Peak

4097m or 13,441'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

69

4091m or 13,422'

604'

70

4090m or 13,418'

514'

71

“Keyhole Plateau” 1This peak appears to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it doesn't have sufficient prominence.

4086m or 13,404'

328'284' to 324' by contours

72

Cardinal Mountain

4083m or 13,396'

600'

73

4081m or 13,390'

390'

74

“Mt. Steven Jay Gould”

4080m or 13,385'

357'

75

“The Cleaver”

4079m or 13,383'

374'

76

4079m or 13,382'

541'

77

4077m or 13,377'

349'

78

“Vagabond Peak”

4076m or 13,374'

349'

79

UTM809631 1This peak appears to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it doesn't have sufficient prominence.

4074m or 13,366'

358'262' to 394' by contours

80

“Point Powell”

4074m or 13,366'

358'

81

4073m or 13,364'

545'

82

4072m or 13,361'

886'

83

4071m or 13,356'

610'

84

4067m or 13,344'

667'

85

4063m or 13,330'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

86

4062m or 13,327'

449'

87

4062m or 13,327'

568'

88

4052m or 13,294'

909'

89

Black Mountain (South)

4051m or 13,291'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

90

4051m or 13,291'

640'

91

4049m or 13,284'

889'

92

4048m or 13,282'

719'

93

Deerhorn Mountain

4048m or 13,281'

666'

94

4043m or 13,265'

341'

95

4043m or 13,264'

814'

96

4043m or 13,264'

928'

97

“Mt. Tom Ross”

4040m or 13,253'

541'

98

Gendarme Peak 1This peak appears to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it doesn't have sufficient prominence.

4039m or 13,252'

312'292' to 332' by contours

99

4036m or 13,242'

755'

100

“South Basin Peak”

4036m or 13,240'

507'

101

4033m or 13,232'

531'

102

“Adamson Point” 1This peak appears to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it doesn't have sufficient prominence.

4033m or 13,232'

358'280' to 360' by contours

103

4032m or 13,228'

489'

104

“Mt. Carl Heller”

4031m or 13,225'

495'

105

Mt. Julius Caesar

4029m or 13,219'

479'

106

4025m or 13,206'

561'

107

4025m or 13,204'

791'

108

“Ruby Peak”

4020m or 13,188'

475'

109

4019m or 13,186'

607'

110

4019m or 13,186'

463'

111

Acrodectes Peak

4018m or 13,182'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

112

4018m or 13,181'

443'

113

4017m or 13,179'

374'

114

Striped Mountain

4017m or 13,179'

541'

115

4016m or 13,176'

387'

116

UTM528173 1This peak appears to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it doesn't have sufficient prominence.

4015m or 13,172'

318'292' to 332' by contours

117

4014m or 13,169'

413'

118

Ericsson Crag 1 1This peak appears to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it doesn't have sufficient prominence.

4011m or 13,159'

315'262' to 394' by contours

119

4006m or 13,143'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

120

“Picture Peak” 1This peak appears to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it doesn't have sufficient prominence. 4This peak appears to be tall enough for inclusion in the 4000-Meter Peaks based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it's too short.

4005m or 13,140'3999m to 4011m by contours

305'240' to 320' by contours

121

4004m or 13,136'

614'

122

Red Slate Mountain

4004m or 13,136'

300m+Prominence is greater than 300 meters

123

4001m or 13,127'

886'

Marginal Failing Peaks

Rank

Each passing peak is ranked among all other passing peaks, as determined using 'Best available data' (VRMC passing criteria).

Peak Name

Peak names not yet recognized by the U.S. Geological Survey are surrounded by quotation marks.

Click a peak name to see detailed peak information including a (2-D) MyTopo Map of the summit area.

Elevation

The elevation is determined using 'Best available data' (VRMC passing criteria).

Click an elevation to focus on detailed peak information.

Prominence

The prominence is determined using 'Best available data' (VRMC passing criteria).

Mt. Irvine 2This peak does not appear to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it does have sufficient prominence. 3This peak is tall enough for inclusion in the 4000-Meter Peaks based on 'Best available data', so it will be included if it does end up having sufficient prominence.

4204m or 13,793'

226'197' to 328' by contours

Mt. Corcoran 2This peak does not appear to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it does have sufficient prominence. 3This peak is tall enough for inclusion in the 4000-Meter Peaks based on 'Best available data', so it will be included if it does end up having sufficient prominence.

4184m or 13,727'

223'197' to 328' by contours

UTM769620 2This peak does not appear to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it does have sufficient prominence. 3This peak is tall enough for inclusion in the 4000-Meter Peaks based on 'Best available data', so it will be included if it does end up having sufficient prominence.

4182m or 13,720'

295'269' to 335' by contours

UTM883438 2This peak does not appear to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it does have sufficient prominence. 3This peak is tall enough for inclusion in the 4000-Meter Peaks based on 'Best available data', so it will be included if it does end up having sufficient prominence.

4169m or 13,678'

279'197' to 328' by contours

“Sharktooth” 2This peak does not appear to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it does have sufficient prominence. 3This peak is tall enough for inclusion in the 4000-Meter Peaks based on 'Best available data', so it will be included if it does end up having sufficient prominence.

4165m or 13,665'

259'197' to 328' by contours

“Mt. Williams” 2This peak does not appear to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it does have sufficient prominence. 3This peak is tall enough for inclusion in the 4000-Meter Peaks based on 'Best available data', so it will be included if it does end up having sufficient prominence.

4152m or 13,622'

259'236' to 302' by contours

UTM857461 2This peak does not appear to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it does have sufficient prominence. 3This peak is tall enough for inclusion in the 4000-Meter Peaks based on 'Best available data', so it will be included if it does end up having sufficient prominence.

4124m or 13,530'

223'197' to 328' by contours

UTM777615 2This peak does not appear to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it does have sufficient prominence. 3This peak is tall enough for inclusion in the 4000-Meter Peaks based on 'Best available data', so it will be included if it does end up having sufficient prominence.

4087m or 13,409'

240'197' to 328' by contours

UTM783617 2This peak does not appear to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it does have sufficient prominence. 3This peak is tall enough for inclusion in the 4000-Meter Peaks based on 'Best available data', so it will be included if it does end up having sufficient prominence.

4067m or 13,343'

269'197' to 328' by contours

UTM751908 2This peak does not appear to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it does have sufficient prominence. 3This peak is tall enough for inclusion in the 4000-Meter Peaks based on 'Best available data', so it will be included if it does end up having sufficient prominence.

4043m or 13,264'

299'272' to 338' by contours

Centennial Peak 2This peak does not appear to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it does have sufficient prominence. 3This peak is tall enough for inclusion in the 4000-Meter Peaks based on 'Best available data', so it will be included if it does end up having sufficient prominence.

4032m or 13,228'

276'236' to 302' by contours

UTM852432 2This peak does not appear to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it does have sufficient prominence. 3This peak is tall enough for inclusion in the 4000-Meter Peaks based on 'Best available data', so it will be included if it does end up having sufficient prominence.

4029m or 13,219'

236'197' to 328' by contours

UTM692578 2This peak does not appear to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it does have sufficient prominence. 5This peak appears to be too short for inclusion in the 4000-Meter Peaks based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it is tall enough.

3989m or 13,087'3980m to 4000m by contours

236'197' to 328' by contours

UTM678596 2This peak does not appear to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it does have sufficient prominence. 5This peak appears to be too short for inclusion in the 4000-Meter Peaks based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it is tall enough.

3986m or 13,077'3980m to 4000m by contours

226'197' to 328' by contours

Ericsson Crag 2 2This peak does not appear to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it does have sufficient prominence. 5This peak appears to be too short for inclusion in the 4000-Meter Peaks based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it is tall enough.

3983m or 13,068'3980m to 4000m by contours

217'197' to 328' by contours

¹	This peak appears to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it doesn't have sufficient prominence.
²	This peak does not appear to have 300' of prominence based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it does have sufficient prominence.
³	This peak is tall enough for inclusion in the 4000-Meter Peaks based on 'Best available data', so it will be included if it does end up having sufficient prominence.
⁴	This peak appears to be tall enough for inclusion in the 4000-Meter Peaks based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it's too short.
⁵	This peak appears to be too short for inclusion in the 4000-Meter Peaks based on 'Best available data'. However, based on 'Spot or contours' there is a chance that it is tall enough.

Back to VRMC Home Page

Please e-mail comments regarding this web site to: webmaster@vulgarianramblers.org.

© 2000-2015, Chris Schneider. All Rights Reserved Worldwide (except as attributed).
(in a very minor association with Amazon.com)

Last updated 11 December, 2009